By the Way

I am better than others!

no-image-avialableSome officers are very sensitive about the prefix before their names if they happen to be a doctor. If any notification by DoPT is issued without prefix, they see to it that it is renotified with correction though it does not change the status of the officer. It happened in the case of Kshatrapati Shivaji, 1986-batch Maharashtra cadre IAS officer, who is India’s new executive director at Manila-based Asian Development Bank (ADB). Twenty-four days after an official order was issued, there was a “partial modification” of the order. In a corrigendum, issued on October 28, which was dubbed as “Most Immediate/Confidential”, it was said that “Shri Kshatrapati Shivaji” should be read as “Dr Kshatrapati Shivaji”. Issued by the establishment office of the DoPT and signed by a deputy secretary-ranked officer, the corrigendum was sent to 20 different offices, including to the offices of the Cabinet Secretary and Principal Secretary to the PM et al, following the usual official procedure. The original order was issued on October 4. Shivaji is a civil engineer with an M Tech degree in building science; he is an MA in economics and also holds two additional degrees—one MBA and another PhD in management. Can an officer be a better performer if he or she holds a PhD degree? And does the government need to write Dr Y or Dr X, moment an officer gets a PhD degree. Instead, the question should be whether the government should really be wasting so much time and effort on such cosmetic efforts. An utter waste, no doubt, to pamper inflated egos and a sense of entitlement! Shivaji must have insisted that a corrigendum be issued, in the hope that his performance and dignity would probably go up after adding the honorific ‘Doctor’. Getting posted as ED, ADB, Manila, is not easy, particularly as the posting should have legitimately gone to a Foreign Service officer. But, the IFS officers don’t serve in States’ districts and thus unable to cultivate politicians. Serving in districts is, therefore, considered more important than serving in foreign countries. This explains why the IFS is no longer considered a sought-after service.

VOL. 10, ISSUE 8 | NOV, 2016

Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

To Top
Latest Articles
close slider

Lastest Articles

From the Editor:Anil Tyagi
Eyes Wide Shut :A Kafkaesque trial in our times
Corruption :From Raj to Rafale 5 – The Mundhra case
Cover Story:Farmer Crisis Waiting to explode
Cover Story:Crisis in Indian Agriculture: Can it be Overcome?
Cover Story: Promoting Cooperative Farm Start-Ups
Governance:‘Development’ sans equity is a scam
Governance:Keeping NGOs in check
Governance:Responding to taxpayer’s woes
State Scan:Dawn of Chhindwara model
Bric a Brac:Searching for a president
Bric a Brac:Deciding Rajasthan
Bric a Brac :Journos rush in…
Bric a Brac:A circus of sorts
By the way :Big brother is watching
By the way :IAS vs IPS in UP
By the way:Change of fortunes
By the way:Slip between the cup and the lip